From cringe to offense
On the American Dialect Society mailing list this morning, Charlie
Doyle observed that the aversion to the word
moist -- which Mark Liberman has
reported on
here,
here,
and
here
-- has ratcheted up, at least at the University of Georgia:
A student in my Shakespeare class
announced that the word "moist" (which I had uttered to describe Egypt
in Antony & Cleopatra) is
offensive to women. Some of the other women in the class concurred (not
hostilely--just as a matter of information for a clueless male
professor). I was somewhat flabbergasted, and nobody would articulate a
reason for the offensiveness--except for one male student's eventual
suggestion that the word reminds women of sexual arousal. That
association is not at all beside-the-point of my description of Egypt
in the play--but why would such a connotation make the word offensive
per se? As far as I could ascertain, "damp" and "wet" don't carry
whatever stigma attaches to "moist." What am I missing here?!
What started as a cringe by individual people (mostly women) at the
word has now been elevated to a perception (at least by some women)
that the word is offensive to women in general.
Posted by Arnold Zwicky at October 25, 2007 01:22 PM